<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 357 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361530</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on various issues. It held that reimbursement of Bank Guarantee Commission to a non-resident was not subject to disallowance under Section 40(a)(i). Interest income from fixed deposits was categorized as &quot;Income from Other Sources.&quot; Expenditures related to arbitration proceedings were treated as revenue expenses. Deemed export benefits were excluded to prevent double taxation. Adhoc disallowance of 20% of travelling expenses was upheld. Payments for included services under the India-USA tax agreement were not taxable in India. The Tribunal&#039;s decision favored the assessee on these grounds, with the order issued on 31/05/2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 09:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 357 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361530</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on various issues. It held that reimbursement of Bank Guarantee Commission to a non-resident was not subject to disallowance under Section 40(a)(i). Interest income from fixed deposits was categorized as &quot;Income from Other Sources.&quot; Expenditures related to arbitration proceedings were treated as revenue expenses. Deemed export benefits were excluded to prevent double taxation. Adhoc disallowance of 20% of travelling expenses was upheld. Payments for included services under the India-USA tax agreement were not taxable in India. The Tribunal&#039;s decision favored the assessee on these grounds, with the order issued on 31/05/2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>