<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 59 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13274</link>
    <description>The High Court found that the Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand the case lacked proper consideration of the facts and was based on contradictory observations. The matter was referred back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision after providing a fair opportunity for both sides to present their case. The High Court clarified that any previous opinions expressed were provisional, and the Tribunal was tasked with reevaluating the issue without bias.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:06:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 59 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13274</link>
      <description>The High Court found that the Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand the case lacked proper consideration of the facts and was based on contradictory observations. The matter was referred back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision after providing a fair opportunity for both sides to present their case. The High Court clarified that any previous opinions expressed were provisional, and the Tribunal was tasked with reevaluating the issue without bias.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>