<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 356 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361529</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the treatment of Sales Tax (VAT) Exemption Benefit and Excise Duty incentive/refund as capital receipts. The appeals by the revenue were dismissed, as the incentives were granted for industrial development purposes and were rightfully considered capital in nature. The tribunal found no grounds to interfere with the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, based on legal precedents and government policies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 08:58:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 356 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361529</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the treatment of Sales Tax (VAT) Exemption Benefit and Excise Duty incentive/refund as capital receipts. The appeals by the revenue were dismissed, as the incentives were granted for industrial development purposes and were rightfully considered capital in nature. The tribunal found no grounds to interfere with the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, based on legal precedents and government policies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>