<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 354 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361527</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D, while restoring the issues of advertisement and commission and brokerage expenses for fresh adjudication to consider them as part of the project cost under the percentage completion method. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2018 17:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 354 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361527</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D, while restoring the issues of advertisement and commission and brokerage expenses for fresh adjudication to consider them as part of the project cost under the percentage completion method. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>