<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 352 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361525</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that no fees under Section 234E could be charged in an order passed under Section 154 for periods before 01.06.2015. The decision was based on a recent ruling by the Chandigarh Bench of the ITAT and the principle favoring the assessee in cases of conflicting views. As a result, the fees charged under Section 234E were removed, and the appeal was partially granted. Other grounds were not addressed as the legal issue sufficed for the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 08:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 352 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361525</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that no fees under Section 234E could be charged in an order passed under Section 154 for periods before 01.06.2015. The decision was based on a recent ruling by the Chandigarh Bench of the ITAT and the principle favoring the assessee in cases of conflicting views. As a result, the fees charged under Section 234E were removed, and the appeal was partially granted. Other grounds were not addressed as the legal issue sufficed for the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>