<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 115 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13273</link>
    <description>The court rejected the applicant&#039;s contentions regarding the computation of relief under section 80HHC, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation that section 80AB has an overriding effect in calculating deductions under Chapter VI-A. The court emphasized alignment of section 80HHC deductions with the Act&#039;s provisions, particularly section 80AB, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The references were answered against the assessee, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:05:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 115 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13273</link>
      <description>The court rejected the applicant&#039;s contentions regarding the computation of relief under section 80HHC, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation that section 80AB has an overriding effect in calculating deductions under Chapter VI-A. The court emphasized alignment of section 80HHC deductions with the Act&#039;s provisions, particularly section 80AB, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The references were answered against the assessee, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>