<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 344 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361517</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order that imposed penalties under the Customs Act, 1962. The decision highlighted the inadvertent nature of the error in declaring serial numbers, the genuine intent for re-export, and the lack of evidence supporting penal consequences. Emphasizing the importance of considering genuine mistakes in customs declarations, the Tribunal referenced precedents allowing re-export without redemption fines or penalties in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 08:20:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 344 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361517</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order that imposed penalties under the Customs Act, 1962. The decision highlighted the inadvertent nature of the error in declaring serial numbers, the genuine intent for re-export, and the lack of evidence supporting penal consequences. Emphasizing the importance of considering genuine mistakes in customs declarations, the Tribunal referenced precedents allowing re-export without redemption fines or penalties in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>