<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 341 - ATPMLA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361514</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside both the Provisional Attachment Order dated 27.09.2016 and the impugned order dated 20.12.2016. The properties attached under the provisional order were ordered to be released to the appellants. The Tribunal concluded that the acquittal in the Prevention of Corruption Act case negated the basis for the PMLA proceedings, as the allegations and evidence were the same in both cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 08:13:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 341 - ATPMLA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361514</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside both the Provisional Attachment Order dated 27.09.2016 and the impugned order dated 20.12.2016. The properties attached under the provisional order were ordered to be released to the appellants. The Tribunal concluded that the acquittal in the Prevention of Corruption Act case negated the basis for the PMLA proceedings, as the allegations and evidence were the same in both cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>