<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 334 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361507</link>
    <description>Commission received from foreign clients for arranging sale or purchase of goods was treated as consideration for an export of services because the service was rendered to recipients located outside India. The fact that the arrangement ultimately resulted in sales of goods in India did not change the service&#039;s export character. Following prior decisions on the issue, CESTAT Mumbai held that the activity qualified as export of services and was not liable to service tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 08:07:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 334 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361507</link>
      <description>Commission received from foreign clients for arranging sale or purchase of goods was treated as consideration for an export of services because the service was rendered to recipients located outside India. The fact that the arrangement ultimately resulted in sales of goods in India did not change the service&#039;s export character. Following prior decisions on the issue, CESTAT Mumbai held that the activity qualified as export of services and was not liable to service tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>