<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 328 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361501</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT HYDERABAD overturned the Commissioner (Appeals) decision in a case involving the interpretation of exemption notifications No. 23/2003-CE and No. 8/97-CE. The tribunal ruled that imported materials used by a 100% EOU in manufacturing drugs could qualify for exemption under Notification No. 23/2003-CE, even if procured through a dealer. It was established that products manufactured using imported consumables alongside domestically produced raw materials could still benefit from the notification. The classification of specific materials as raw materials or consumables hinged on the burden of proof, leading to the appeal being allowed and the previous order set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 07:32:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 328 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361501</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT HYDERABAD overturned the Commissioner (Appeals) decision in a case involving the interpretation of exemption notifications No. 23/2003-CE and No. 8/97-CE. The tribunal ruled that imported materials used by a 100% EOU in manufacturing drugs could qualify for exemption under Notification No. 23/2003-CE, even if procured through a dealer. It was established that products manufactured using imported consumables alongside domestically produced raw materials could still benefit from the notification. The classification of specific materials as raw materials or consumables hinged on the burden of proof, leading to the appeal being allowed and the previous order set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>