https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361500 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision to set aside the Order-in-Original, granting relief to the assessee. The department's appeal was rejected due to insufficient evidence of clandestine removal of goods. The judgment highlighted the importance of providing conclusive evidence and adhering to procedural requirements in excise duty disputes, emphasizing the burden of proof on the department. en-us Wed, 06 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Jun 2018 07:32:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361500 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision to set aside the Order-in-Original, granting relief to the assessee. The department's appeal was rejected due to insufficient evidence of clandestine removal of goods. The judgment highlighted the importance of providing conclusive evidence and adhering to procedural requirements in excise duty disputes, emphasizing the burden of proof on the department. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 06 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361500