https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361494 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision denying SSI exemption on goods with brand names 'SWEP' and 'RIFOX.' The Appellant's failure to challenge the initial denial for 'RIFOX' goods led to the finality of that decision. Despite later claiming manufacturing under 'RIFOX India,' not 'RIFOX,' the Tribunal rejected this argument as an afterthought. Not appealing the initial denial barred the Appellant from challenging the decision's merits. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely appeals and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, dismissing the Appellant's appeal. en-us Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Jun 2018 07:23:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361494 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision denying SSI exemption on goods with brand names 'SWEP' and 'RIFOX.' The Appellant's failure to challenge the initial denial for 'RIFOX' goods led to the finality of that decision. Despite later claiming manufacturing under 'RIFOX India,' not 'RIFOX,' the Tribunal rejected this argument as an afterthought. Not appealing the initial denial barred the Appellant from challenging the decision's merits. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely appeals and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, dismissing the Appellant's appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361494