<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 320 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361493</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order, ruling that the demands against Appellant M/s RKP were not sustainable due to lack of corroborative evidence and unreliable statements from suppliers and transporters. The appeals by RKP and co-appellants were allowed, with penalties against them dismissed as the main demand was not upheld. The judgment was pronounced on 11.5.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 07:22:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 320 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361493</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order, ruling that the demands against Appellant M/s RKP were not sustainable due to lack of corroborative evidence and unreliable statements from suppliers and transporters. The appeals by RKP and co-appellants were allowed, with penalties against them dismissed as the main demand was not upheld. The judgment was pronounced on 11.5.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>