<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 313 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361486</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving the interpretation of Section Note-6 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Tribunal found that the goods in question were complete and finished when received by the appellant, making the application of Section Note-6 unnecessary. Additionally, the Tribunal agreed that the goods fell under Circular No.583/20/2001-CE, which clarified that certain actions did not constitute manufacture. As a result, the Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments for penalties and confiscation of goods under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rule, 2002.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 07:18:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 313 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361486</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving the interpretation of Section Note-6 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Tribunal found that the goods in question were complete and finished when received by the appellant, making the application of Section Note-6 unnecessary. Additionally, the Tribunal agreed that the goods fell under Circular No.583/20/2001-CE, which clarified that certain actions did not constitute manufacture. As a result, the Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments for penalties and confiscation of goods under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rule, 2002.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>