<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 307 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361480</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the refund claim not time-barred as duty was paid under protest. The appellant successfully demonstrated that the duty burden was not passed on to customers, as invoices did not mention the duty. The Tribunal ordered the Revenue to refund the amount with interest within 90 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 07:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 307 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361480</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the refund claim not time-barred as duty was paid under protest. The appellant successfully demonstrated that the duty burden was not passed on to customers, as invoices did not mention the duty. The Tribunal ordered the Revenue to refund the amount with interest within 90 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>