<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 305 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361478</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld certain demands on CENVAT Credit while setting aside others. The interest liability on reversed amounts was upheld but penalties were reduced. For overhead cranes, the demand was set aside based on evidence. However, for GTA services, the issue was remanded for further review. The decision considered legal arguments and evidence, resulting in a mixed outcome for both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 07:04:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 305 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361478</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld certain demands on CENVAT Credit while setting aside others. The interest liability on reversed amounts was upheld but penalties were reduced. For overhead cranes, the demand was set aside based on evidence. However, for GTA services, the issue was remanded for further review. The decision considered legal arguments and evidence, resulting in a mixed outcome for both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>