<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 815 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273132</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted registration to the Trust with effect from 31st January 1997, despite the delay in filing the application under section 12A(a) of the Income-tax Act. The delay was attributed to the trustees&#039; lack of knowledge and control over the situation, which was considered a bona fide mistake. The Tribunal emphasized that delays could be condoned if sufficient cause was shown, and in this case, the trustees&#039; backgrounds justified their unawareness of legal complexities. The Commissioner&#039;s procedural lapse in not providing the assessee with an opportunity to be heard led to the quashing of the order and the direction to grant registration from the initial date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2018 16:14:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 815 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273132</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted registration to the Trust with effect from 31st January 1997, despite the delay in filing the application under section 12A(a) of the Income-tax Act. The delay was attributed to the trustees&#039; lack of knowledge and control over the situation, which was considered a bona fide mistake. The Tribunal emphasized that delays could be condoned if sufficient cause was shown, and in this case, the trustees&#039; backgrounds justified their unawareness of legal complexities. The Commissioner&#039;s procedural lapse in not providing the assessee with an opportunity to be heard led to the quashing of the order and the direction to grant registration from the initial date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>