https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361450 The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside the orders of the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) and restoring the issues of Rs. 3,03,455 and Rs. 17,15,733 for fresh examination by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal held that there was sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeal and admitted it for hearing. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reevaluate the addition of Rs. 3,03,455 related to unaccounted investment, noting that the transactions were not adequately examined. en-us Wed, 30 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jun 2018 08:52:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361450 The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside the orders of the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) and restoring the issues of Rs. 3,03,455 and Rs. 17,15,733 for fresh examination by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal held that there was sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeal and admitted it for hearing. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reevaluate the addition of Rs. 3,03,455 related to unaccounted investment, noting that the transactions were not adequately examined. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 30 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361450