<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 274 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361447</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, invalidating the reassessment and additions made by the AO. The reassessment under section 148 was deemed impermissible as it was based on a mere change of opinion without fresh tangible material, leading to the quashing of the assessment under the IT Act. The additions made by the AO towards interest on a partner&#039;s negative capital were also invalidated, resulting in the appeal being allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2018 08:47:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 274 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361447</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, invalidating the reassessment and additions made by the AO. The reassessment under section 148 was deemed impermissible as it was based on a mere change of opinion without fresh tangible material, leading to the quashing of the assessment under the IT Act. The additions made by the AO towards interest on a partner&#039;s negative capital were also invalidated, resulting in the appeal being allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>