<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 272 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361445</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals by the assessee challenging the imposition of late fees under section 234E of the I.T. Act for delayed filing of TDS statements. The delay in filing the appeals was considered unjustified, and the non-maintainability of the appeals before the Ld. CIT(A) was upheld. The Tribunal confirmed the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order, citing legal provisions and emphasizing that the late fee orders were served online, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2018 12:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 272 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361445</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals by the assessee challenging the imposition of late fees under section 234E of the I.T. Act for delayed filing of TDS statements. The delay in filing the appeals was considered unjustified, and the non-maintainability of the appeals before the Ld. CIT(A) was upheld. The Tribunal confirmed the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order, citing legal provisions and emphasizing that the late fee orders were served online, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>