<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 270 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361443</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, holding that the land sold was not agricultural, making Section 50C applicable for determining the sale consideration. The decision was supported by evidence collected by the A.O. and various authorities. The Tribunal also upheld the rejection of additional evidence under Rule 46A by the CIT(A), as the assessee did not challenge this decision further.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 18:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 270 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361443</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, holding that the land sold was not agricultural, making Section 50C applicable for determining the sale consideration. The decision was supported by evidence collected by the A.O. and various authorities. The Tribunal also upheld the rejection of additional evidence under Rule 46A by the CIT(A), as the assessee did not challenge this decision further.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>