https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361438 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, setting aside the Initiation Notification, Final Finding, and Customs Notifications related to the extension and retrospective revival of Anti-Dumping Duty. The court emphasized strict adherence to statutory timelines and procedural requirements, holding that the duty could not be extended or revived beyond its original period without proper initiation and notification within the specified timeframes. The judgment highlighted the importance of following legal procedures in imposing and extending Anti-Dumping Duties. en-us Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Sep 2018 11:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361438 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, setting aside the Initiation Notification, Final Finding, and Customs Notifications related to the extension and retrospective revival of Anti-Dumping Duty. The court emphasized strict adherence to statutory timelines and procedural requirements, holding that the duty could not be extended or revived beyond its original period without proper initiation and notification within the specified timeframes. The judgment highlighted the importance of following legal procedures in imposing and extending Anti-Dumping Duties. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361438