<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 263 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361436</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing appeals from both the Appellant and the Revenue. The demands confirmed in the order were upheld, and penalties imposed were deemed appropriate. The decision emphasized compliance with exemption conditions, denying exemption, confiscating the machine, and requiring duty payment as proposed in the show cause notice. Strict adherence to import conditions was highlighted, emphasizing the consequences of non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2018 08:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 263 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361436</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing appeals from both the Appellant and the Revenue. The demands confirmed in the order were upheld, and penalties imposed were deemed appropriate. The decision emphasized compliance with exemption conditions, denying exemption, confiscating the machine, and requiring duty payment as proposed in the show cause notice. Strict adherence to import conditions was highlighted, emphasizing the consequences of non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>