https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361435 The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of imported machinery due to non-declaration in the bill of entry, despite the appellant's claim of benefits under Notification No. 52/2003 for EOU. The imposition of redemption fine and penalties under Sections 111(1) and (m) of the Customs Act, 1962 was affirmed, with the Tribunal finding no grounds to interfere with the lower authorities' decision. The appeal was rejected, and the impugned order was upheld, with the judgment pronounced on 02/05/2018. en-us Wed, 02 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jun 2018 08:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361435 The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of imported machinery due to non-declaration in the bill of entry, despite the appellant's claim of benefits under Notification No. 52/2003 for EOU. The imposition of redemption fine and penalties under Sections 111(1) and (m) of the Customs Act, 1962 was affirmed, with the Tribunal finding no grounds to interfere with the lower authorities' decision. The appeal was rejected, and the impugned order was upheld, with the judgment pronounced on 02/05/2018. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 02 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361435