https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361427 The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal before the Tribunal, emphasizing the lack of a plausible explanation for the substantial delay of four years, nine months, and twenty days. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of timely filing, noting the absence of efforts to prevent the delay. Consequently, the Tribunal held that it was not a fit case for condonation of delay, leading to the rejection of the application on 15.05.2018. en-us Tue, 15 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jun 2018 08:00:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361427 The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal before the Tribunal, emphasizing the lack of a plausible explanation for the substantial delay of four years, nine months, and twenty days. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of timely filing, noting the absence of efforts to prevent the delay. Consequently, the Tribunal held that it was not a fit case for condonation of delay, leading to the rejection of the application on 15.05.2018. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 15 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361427