<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 251 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361424</link>
    <description>Refund of service tax paid on garbage collection and disposal services was admissible because the recipient was a statutory body and the services fell within Notification No. 25/2012-ST. The services related to sanitation, conservancy and solid waste management in the MIDC area, and later proceedings had established that MIDC was a statutory body with no service tax liability on the services in question. Since tax had been paid in excess, the refund claim was rightly allowed and the order denying refund was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 10:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 251 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361424</link>
      <description>Refund of service tax paid on garbage collection and disposal services was admissible because the recipient was a statutory body and the services fell within Notification No. 25/2012-ST. The services related to sanitation, conservancy and solid waste management in the MIDC area, and later proceedings had established that MIDC was a statutory body with no service tax liability on the services in question. Since tax had been paid in excess, the refund claim was rightly allowed and the order denying refund was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>