<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 241 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361414</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand against the Appellant regarding the correct price adoption for clearance of goods between two plants of the same company. The decision was based on the finding that the Appellant had adopted the appropriate price in line with legal interpretations, rejecting the demand and providing consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2018 07:26:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 241 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361414</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand against the Appellant regarding the correct price adoption for clearance of goods between two plants of the same company. The decision was based on the finding that the Appellant had adopted the appropriate price in line with legal interpretations, rejecting the demand and providing consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>