<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 237 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361410</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, finding that the disallowed CENVAT Credits for various services, including erection/commissioning of transmission line, sugar cane development program, SMS services, repair and maintenance of harvesting machine, and hotel/traveling services, were admissible. The Tribunal determined that these services were directly related to the manufacturing process and contributed significantly to sugar production, leading to the modification of the impugned order in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2018 07:25:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 237 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361410</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, finding that the disallowed CENVAT Credits for various services, including erection/commissioning of transmission line, sugar cane development program, SMS services, repair and maintenance of harvesting machine, and hotel/traveling services, were admissible. The Tribunal determined that these services were directly related to the manufacturing process and contributed significantly to sugar production, leading to the modification of the impugned order in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>