https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361409 The Tribunal allowed redemption of seized goods upon payment of fines and penalties, addressing concerns over the use of a third-party brand name affecting SSI exemption eligibility. While goods were confiscated due to brand name usage, duty exemption was granted for specific items, leading to a reduction in redemption fine and penalty. The Tribunal deemed the initial fines excessive, reducing them to Rs. 10,000 and Rs. 5,000 respectively, providing financial relief to the appellant while upholding duty obligations. en-us Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jun 2018 07:25:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361409 The Tribunal allowed redemption of seized goods upon payment of fines and penalties, addressing concerns over the use of a third-party brand name affecting SSI exemption eligibility. While goods were confiscated due to brand name usage, duty exemption was granted for specific items, leading to a reduction in redemption fine and penalty. The Tribunal deemed the initial fines excessive, reducing them to Rs. 10,000 and Rs. 5,000 respectively, providing financial relief to the appellant while upholding duty obligations. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361409