<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 148 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13256</link>
    <description>The High Court of Allahabad ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the interest and compensation amount from the acquisition of land should not be included in the net wealth. The Court emphasized the lack of a final decree and non-acceptance of a compromise petition, stating that possession did not confer ownership without a valid transfer of title. The Court concluded that the right to compensation was subject to litigation, making the assessee a mere depositor of the amount. Ultimately, the Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to exclude the disputed amount from the assessee&#039;s net wealth, ruling against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 17:02:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 148 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13256</link>
      <description>The High Court of Allahabad ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the interest and compensation amount from the acquisition of land should not be included in the net wealth. The Court emphasized the lack of a final decree and non-acceptance of a compromise petition, stating that possession did not confer ownership without a valid transfer of title. The Court concluded that the right to compensation was subject to litigation, making the assessee a mere depositor of the amount. Ultimately, the Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to exclude the disputed amount from the assessee&#039;s net wealth, ruling against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>