<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 225 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361398</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially or fully allowed the appeals on various issues, emphasizing the requirement for corroborative evidence to support additions and the significance of proper enquiry by the AO. The Tribunal highlighted the limitations of the CIT&#039;s powers under section 263, quashing the revision of assessment orders due to lack of new material and emphasizing that loss of revenue alone does not justify revision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 19:24:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 225 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361398</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially or fully allowed the appeals on various issues, emphasizing the requirement for corroborative evidence to support additions and the significance of proper enquiry by the AO. The Tribunal highlighted the limitations of the CIT&#039;s powers under section 263, quashing the revision of assessment orders due to lack of new material and emphasizing that loss of revenue alone does not justify revision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>