<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 220 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361393</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The rejection of books of account was deemed unjustified, leading to the deletion of a trading addition of Rs. 45,96,781/-. Additionally, the addition for delayed PF &amp;amp; ESI contributions was removed. The ITAT emphasized the importance of verifiable sales and purchases, as well as the timely payment of statutory dues, in line with previous rulings and judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 19:24:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 220 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361393</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The rejection of books of account was deemed unjustified, leading to the deletion of a trading addition of Rs. 45,96,781/-. Additionally, the addition for delayed PF &amp;amp; ESI contributions was removed. The ITAT emphasized the importance of verifiable sales and purchases, as well as the timely payment of statutory dues, in line with previous rulings and judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>