<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 216 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361389</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue&#039;s interest, as required under Section 263. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner of Income Tax did not provide specific findings on the issues raised and therefore set aside the CIT&#039;s order, restoring the original assessment order. The appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 18:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 216 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361389</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue&#039;s interest, as required under Section 263. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner of Income Tax did not provide specific findings on the issues raised and therefore set aside the CIT&#039;s order, restoring the original assessment order. The appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>