<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 214 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361387</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the reassessment under Section 147 was invalid due to the absence of fresh tangible material. The original assessment was deemed sacrosanct, and reopening without new evidence was impermissible. Consequently, the cross-objection by the assessee was also dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 19:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 214 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361387</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the reassessment under Section 147 was invalid due to the absence of fresh tangible material. The original assessment was deemed sacrosanct, and reopening without new evidence was impermissible. Consequently, the cross-objection by the assessee was also dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>