<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 207 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361380</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi held that supply income from telecommunication equipment was not attributable to a taxable permanent establishment in India, and activities in India did not justify taxing the assessee on that supply profit. It further held that receipts from embedded software supplied with the hardware were not separately taxable as royalty or business income because the software was part of the integrated supply transaction. The Tribunal also sustained proportionate research and development expenditure in the computation of the alleged Indian permanent establishment&#039;s income, finding no material to disallow it. The assessee therefore succeeded on the main taxability issues, with the Revenue failing on the deduction issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 19:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 207 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361380</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi held that supply income from telecommunication equipment was not attributable to a taxable permanent establishment in India, and activities in India did not justify taxing the assessee on that supply profit. It further held that receipts from embedded software supplied with the hardware were not separately taxable as royalty or business income because the software was part of the integrated supply transaction. The Tribunal also sustained proportionate research and development expenditure in the computation of the alleged Indian permanent establishment&#039;s income, finding no material to disallow it. The assessee therefore succeeded on the main taxability issues, with the Revenue failing on the deduction issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>