<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1301 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273127</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant and deleting the disallowance made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A) under section 40(A)(3) of the Income Tax Act. The decision was based on the genuine nature of the payments, the absence of banking facilities in the area, and the specific circumstances of the business operations in a tribal region.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 19:23:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1301 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273127</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant and deleting the disallowance made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A) under section 40(A)(3) of the Income Tax Act. The decision was based on the genuine nature of the payments, the absence of banking facilities in the area, and the specific circumstances of the business operations in a tribal region.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>