<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1196 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273129</link>
    <description>Goods cleared without payment of duty under Chapter X procedure against prescribed certificates and end-use conditions are not treated as exempted or nil-rated goods for Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The obligation to reverse credit or maintain separate accounts arises only where common inputs are used for dutiable and truly exempted clearances. As the duty exemption remained conditional and linked to procedural compliance, the demand for reversal of CENVAT credit, interest and penalty was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 19:23:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1196 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273129</link>
      <description>Goods cleared without payment of duty under Chapter X procedure against prescribed certificates and end-use conditions are not treated as exempted or nil-rated goods for Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The obligation to reverse credit or maintain separate accounts arises only where common inputs are used for dutiable and truly exempted clearances. As the duty exemption remained conditional and linked to procedural compliance, the demand for reversal of CENVAT credit, interest and penalty was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>