https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13251 The High Court of GAUHATI allowed the writ petitions, ruling the impugned notices under sections 148, 142, and 143(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to be illegal and without jurisdiction. The court found the reasons for reopening assessments to be legally flawed and lacking a bona fide belief, similar to a previous case. Consequently, the impugned notices dated March 28, 2003, and January 6, 2004, were set aside as illegal and without jurisdiction. en-us Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 May 2009 16:15:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13251 The High Court of GAUHATI allowed the writ petitions, ruling the impugned notices under sections 148, 142, and 143(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to be illegal and without jurisdiction. The court found the reasons for reopening assessments to be legally flawed and lacking a bona fide belief, similar to a previous case. Consequently, the impugned notices dated March 28, 2003, and January 6, 2004, were set aside as illegal and without jurisdiction. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13251