<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 202 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361375</link>
    <description>The appellant sought a refund of interest on refundable interest paid for delayed service tax payment. The court held that while interest is payable on the duty refundable under Section 11B, there is no provision for payment of interest on the interest paid on service tax. The judge upheld the lower authority&#039;s decision to deny the claim for interest on the delayed sanction of refund, dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 15:01:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 202 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361375</link>
      <description>The appellant sought a refund of interest on refundable interest paid for delayed service tax payment. The court held that while interest is payable on the duty refundable under Section 11B, there is no provision for payment of interest on the interest paid on service tax. The judge upheld the lower authority&#039;s decision to deny the claim for interest on the delayed sanction of refund, dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>