<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 196 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361369</link>
    <description>The application for Rectification of Mistake regarding waiver of penalty under section 73(3) of the Finance Act, 1994 was dismissed. The court held that although the appellant had paid the service tax before the show cause notice, they had not paid the interest at that time, as confirmed by the impugned order and grounds of appeal. The judge found no error requiring rectification, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to statutory provisions and timely payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 14:36:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 196 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361369</link>
      <description>The application for Rectification of Mistake regarding waiver of penalty under section 73(3) of the Finance Act, 1994 was dismissed. The court held that although the appellant had paid the service tax before the show cause notice, they had not paid the interest at that time, as confirmed by the impugned order and grounds of appeal. The judge found no error requiring rectification, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to statutory provisions and timely payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>