https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361362 The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay and proceeded with the appeal despite the absence of appellant representation. The core issue was the service tax liability on the amount received from APSRTC. The Tribunal upheld the tax liability with interest but set aside the imposed penalties, following a precedent. The appeal was disposed of confirming the tax liability and interest while canceling the penalties, emphasizing the significance of adhering to established precedents in tax cases. en-us Thu, 03 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Jun 2018 14:26:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361362 The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay and proceeded with the appeal despite the absence of appellant representation. The core issue was the service tax liability on the amount received from APSRTC. The Tribunal upheld the tax liability with interest but set aside the imposed penalties, following a precedent. The appeal was disposed of confirming the tax liability and interest while canceling the penalties, emphasizing the significance of adhering to established precedents in tax cases. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 03 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361362