<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 184 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361357</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, emphasizing the Supreme Court&#039;s direction to not recover any further interest and the respondent&#039;s eligibility for the interest refund under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998. The detailed analysis of the Supreme Court order and the application of the scheme were crucial in determining the case outcome, with the Tribunal dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 10:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 184 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361357</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, emphasizing the Supreme Court&#039;s direction to not recover any further interest and the respondent&#039;s eligibility for the interest refund under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998. The detailed analysis of the Supreme Court order and the application of the scheme were crucial in determining the case outcome, with the Tribunal dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>