<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 183 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361356</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellate authority&#039;s decision, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming that cotton waste arising during the manufacturing process is not dutiable. The penalties imposed on the respondent were also set aside in line with the duty liability determination. The judgment highlighted the importance of legal precedents and consistent interpretation of laws in resolving issues related to duty liability on manufacturing by-products.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 13:23:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 183 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361356</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellate authority&#039;s decision, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming that cotton waste arising during the manufacturing process is not dutiable. The penalties imposed on the respondent were also set aside in line with the duty liability determination. The judgment highlighted the importance of legal precedents and consistent interpretation of laws in resolving issues related to duty liability on manufacturing by-products.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>