<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 95 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13246</link>
    <description>The court determined that the Tribunal erred in its interpretation of sections 158BC and 158BD of the Income-tax Act, 1961, concerning block assessment. It concluded that the provisions should apply, given the definition of the &quot;block period.&quot; Consequently, the Tribunal&#039;s decision was set aside, reinstating the assessing authority&#039;s decision in favor of the Revenue. The court directed the forwarding of the order to the Tribunal for further action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 16:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 95 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13246</link>
      <description>The court determined that the Tribunal erred in its interpretation of sections 158BC and 158BD of the Income-tax Act, 1961, concerning block assessment. It concluded that the provisions should apply, given the definition of the &quot;block period.&quot; Consequently, the Tribunal&#039;s decision was set aside, reinstating the assessing authority&#039;s decision in favor of the Revenue. The court directed the forwarding of the order to the Tribunal for further action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>