https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361344 Under the GST grievance redressal framework, a reply should specifically address the complaint raised and explain how it has been resolved; a generic or unexplained status marking is insufficient. The Court noted grievances regarding ineffective handling of credit and payment issues in the electronic cash ledger, and the practical difficulty caused when rectification in later returns was treated as a mismatch between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B. It observed prima facie merit in the submission that the grievance mechanism must respond meaningfully to the precise issue raised. The matter remained pending with directions for further response and re-listing, and no final adjudication was made on the tax grievances. en-us Tue, 15 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Feb 2025 16:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361344 Under the GST grievance redressal framework, a reply should specifically address the complaint raised and explain how it has been resolved; a generic or unexplained status marking is insufficient. The Court noted grievances regarding ineffective handling of credit and payment issues in the electronic cash ledger, and the practical difficulty caused when rectification in later returns was treated as a mismatch between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B. It observed prima facie merit in the submission that the grievance mechanism must respond meaningfully to the precise issue raised. The matter remained pending with directions for further response and re-listing, and no final adjudication was made on the tax grievances. Case-Laws GST Tue, 15 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361344