<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 163 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361336</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. It upheld the deletion of penalties related to the disallowance of interest under section 57(iii) and the deemed dividend addition, and it reversed the penalty on the interest addition of Rs. 2,72,391. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessee had not concealed income and that the issues were either debatable or based on reasonableness rather than factual concealment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 18:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 163 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361336</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. It upheld the deletion of penalties related to the disallowance of interest under section 57(iii) and the deemed dividend addition, and it reversed the penalty on the interest addition of Rs. 2,72,391. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessee had not concealed income and that the issues were either debatable or based on reasonableness rather than factual concealment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>