<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 98 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13239</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on investment allowance for switchboards and electric machinery, allowed extra shift allowances calculation, clarified sales tax liability as business loss, favored the assessee on disputed electricity charges liability, and decided not to disallow expenses due to the small amount and previous court observations. The reference was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:17:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 98 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13239</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on investment allowance for switchboards and electric machinery, allowed extra shift allowances calculation, clarified sales tax liability as business loss, favored the assessee on disputed electricity charges liability, and decided not to disallow expenses due to the small amount and previous court observations. The reference was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>