<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 147 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361320</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for both deemed rental value and long-term capital gain on structured products. The Tribunal found the issues debatable, with the assessee&#039;s claims made in good faith based on a plausible interpretation of the law, in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in CIT Vs. Reliance Petroproducts P. Ltd.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 147 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361320</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for both deemed rental value and long-term capital gain on structured products. The Tribunal found the issues debatable, with the assessee&#039;s claims made in good faith based on a plausible interpretation of the law, in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in CIT Vs. Reliance Petroproducts P. Ltd.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>