<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 143 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361316</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order enhancing value, fines, and penalties, but confirming the confiscation of branded goods. The decision emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence in cases of mis-declaration and valuation disputes, highlighting the importance of reliable market enquiries and adherence to legal precedents for fair adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 15:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 143 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361316</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order enhancing value, fines, and penalties, but confirming the confiscation of branded goods. The decision emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence in cases of mis-declaration and valuation disputes, highlighting the importance of reliable market enquiries and adherence to legal precedents for fair adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>