<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 142 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361315</link>
    <description>Import of old and used digital multifunction printers and devices after the 28.02.2013 Foreign Trade Policy amendment required a licence, and import without such licence amounted to a policy violation. The Tribunal followed settled precedent that such post-amendment imports are subject to licensing control. As the appellants had not obtained the required licence, the redemption fine and penalties were upheld, and the challenge was confined to those consequential measures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 142 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361315</link>
      <description>Import of old and used digital multifunction printers and devices after the 28.02.2013 Foreign Trade Policy amendment required a licence, and import without such licence amounted to a policy violation. The Tribunal followed settled precedent that such post-amendment imports are subject to licensing control. As the appellants had not obtained the required licence, the redemption fine and penalties were upheld, and the challenge was confined to those consequential measures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>